Mount Baker Stratovolcano slumbers behind Simon Fraser University (For emphasis, image is not proportional) |
At depths shallower than 30 km (19 mi) or so, the westwardly moving and rising North America Tectonic Plate is locked (stuck) against the easterly moving and sinking (subducting)
Explorer, Juan de Fuca and Gorda Tectonic Plates. Pressure and stress are building in this area (Cascadia 'Subduction' Zone), which is stuck, locked by friction, while strain slowly builds up, pushing up land and mountains on the North American Tectonic Plate as these seismic forces act.
Two years ago scientist put finely tuned GPS laser detectors along a 300 kilometre stretch, on the tops of mountains from the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State, north to the tops of mountains in the Insular Mountain range, north-west of Campbell River, one half way up the east coast of Vancouver Island, BC. YES ! Indeed, the mountains are rising, pushed up from below ! THAT IS NOT A GOOD THING !
Those stuck tectonic plates will break apart when the fault's frictional strength is exceeded and the rocks slip past each other along the fault in a megathrust earthquake. Below 30 km (19 mi) the plate interface exhibits episodic tremor and slip.
The width of the Cascadia subduction zone varies along its length. That depends on the angle of attack of the North American Tectonic Plate after first coming into contact with, and starts rising above the sinking (subducting) Explorer, Juan de Fuca and Gorda Tectonic Plates.
depending on the angle of the sinking Explorer, Juan de Fuca and Gorda Tectonic Plates (subducted) oceanic plate, which heats up as it is pushed deeper beneath the continent. As the edge of the plate sinks and becomes hotter and more molten, the subducting rock eventually loses the ability to store mechanical stress; earthquakes may result. On the Hyndman and Wang diagram (not shown, click on reference link below) the "locked" zone is storing up energy for an earthquake, and the "transition" zone, although somewhat plastic, could probably rupture.[9]
The
Cascadia subduction zone runs from triple
junctions
at its north and south ends. To the north, just below Haida
Gwaii,
it intersects the Haida Gwaii Fault [formerly, the Queen
Charlotte Fault]
and the Explorer
Ridge.
To the south, just off of Cape Mendocino in California, it intersects
the San
Andreas Fault
and the Mendocino
Fracture Zoneat
the Mendocino
Triple Junction.
Megathrust
earthquakes
are the most powerful earthquakes known to occur, and can exceed
magnitude
9.0. They occur when enough energy (stress) has accumulated in the
"locked" zone of the fault to cause a rupture known as a
megathrust
earthquake.
The magnitude of a megathrust earthquake is proportional to length of
the rupture along the fault. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, which
forms the boundary between the Juan de Fuca and North American
plates, is a very long sloping fault that stretches from
mid-Vancouver Island to Northern California.[10]
Because
of the great length of the fault, the Cascadia Subduction Zone is
capable of producing very large earthquakes if rupture occurs along
its entire length. Thermal and deformation studies indicate that the
region 60 kilometers (about 40 miles) downdip
(east) of the deformation front (where plate deformation begins) is
fully locked (the plates do not move past each other). Further
downdip, there is a transition from fully locked to aseismic
sliding.[10]
In
1999, a group of Continuous Global
Positioning System
sites registered a brief reversal of motion of approximately 2
centimeters (0.8 inches) over a 50 kilometer by 300 kilometer (about
30 mile by 200 mile) area. The movement was the equivalent of a 6.7
magnitude earthquake.[11]
The motion did not trigger an earthquake and was only detectable as
silent, non-earthquake seismic signatures.[12]
In
2004, a study conducted by the Geological Society of America analyzed
the potential for land subsidence along the Cascadia subduction zone.
It postulated that several towns and cities on the west coast of
Vancouver Island, such as Tofino
and Ucluelet,
are at risk for a sudden, earthquake initiated, 1–2 m
subsidence.[13]
Studies
of past earthquake traces on both the northern San
Andreas Fault
and the southern Cascadia subduction zone indicate a correlation in
time which may be evidence that quakes on the Cascadia subduction
zone may have triggered most of the major quakes on the northern San
Andreas during at least the past 3,000 years or so. The evidence also
shows the rupture direction going from north to south in each of
these time-correlated events. The 1906
San Francisco earthquake
seems to have been a major exception to this correlation, however, as
it was not preceded by a major Cascadia quake.[14]
The
Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) is a 1,000 km (620 mi) long dipping
fault
that stretches from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape
Mendocino
in northern California. It separates the Juan de Fuca and North
America plates. New Juan de Fuca plate is created offshore along the
Juan
de Fuca Ridge.[7][8]
The
Juan de Fuca Tectonic Plate moves eastward, toward, and eventually is
shoved beneath, the continent North American Tectonic Plate? (A
better way to state this, for clearer understanding, would be to
state that the western moving North American Tectonic Plate butts up
against the Pacific Plates, and rises above them. evidenced by the
GPS mapping of mountain peaks rising, from the Olympic Peninsula in
Washington State all the way north to the mountains north-west of
Campbell River. RISING MOUNTAINS are NOT A GOOD THING. Eventually,
they will DROP back down, most likely in five to twelve minutes,
during the Cascadia Megaquake).
In between five to twelve minutes, the North American west coast
will all drop down one to three metres. Places like Chesterman
Beach and Long Beach
in British Columbia will liquefy and Tofino
and Ucluelet,
BC will also drop down one – three metres, below the level of the
Pacific Ocean. In addition, the incoming Megatsunami as a result of
the Cascadia Megaquake could be 12 stories (120 feet) high.
The
North American Tectonic Plate only surfaces offshore about 80
kilometre, under the Pacific Ocean at what has been called the
Cascadia Subduction Zone, The zone separates the Juan
de Fuca Plate,
Explorer
Plate,
Gorda
Plate,
and North
American Plate.
Here, the oceanic
crust
of the
Pacific Ocean has been sinking beneath the continent for about 200
million years, and currently does so at a rate of approximately 40
mm/yr.[7][8]
“Sinking
beneath the continent mis-characterizes and does not lead to greater
clarity”. My opinion, starting about 200 kilometres east of the
'Cascadia Fault' and about 160 kilometres inland to the east, the
western moving North American Tectonic Plate butts up against the
Pacific Plates, and rises above them.
At
depths shallower than 30 km (19 mi) or so, the Cascadia zone is
locked by friction while strain slowly builds up as the subduction
forces act, until the fault's frictional strength is exceeded and the
rocks slip past each other along the fault in a megathrust
earthquake.
Below 30 km (19 mi) the plate interface exhibits episodic
tremor and slip.
The
width of the Cascadia subduction zone varies along its length,
depending on the angle of the subducted oceanic plate, which heats up
as it is pushed deeper beneath the continent. As the edge of the
plate sinks and becomes hotter and more molten, the subducting rock
eventually loses the ability to store mechanical stress; earthquakes
may result. On the Hyndman and Wang diagram (not shown, click on
reference link below) the "locked" zone is storing up
energy for an earthquake, and the "transition" zone,
although somewhat plastic, could probably rupture.[9]
The
Cascadia subduction zone runs from triple
junctions
at its north and south ends. To the north, just below Haida
Gwaii,
it intersects the Queen
Charlotte Fault
and the Explorer
Ridge.
To the south, just off of Cape Mendocino in California, it intersects
the San
Andreas Fault
and the Mendocino
Fracture Zone
at the Mendocino
Triple Junction.
Cascadia earthquake sources
Megathrust
earthquakes
are the most powerful earthquakes known to occur, and can exceed
magnitude9.0.
They occur when enough energy (stress) has accumulated in the
"locked" zone of the fault to cause a rupture known as a
megathrust
earthquake.
The magnitude of a megathrust earthquake is proportional to length of
the rupture along the fault. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, which
forms the boundary between the Juan de Fuca and North American
plates, is a very long sloping fault that stretches from
mid-Vancouver Island to Northern California.[10]
Because
of the great length of the fault, the Cascadia Subduction Zone is
capable of producing very large earthquakes if rupture occurs along
its entire length. Thermal and deformation studies indicate that the
region 60 kilometers (about 40 miles) downdip
(east)
of the deformation front (where plate deformation begins) is fully
locked (the plates do not move past each other). Further downdip,
there is a transition from fully locked to a
seismic sliding.[10]
In
1999, a group of Continuous Global
Positioning System
sites registered a brief reversal of motion of approximately 2
centimeters (0.8 inches) over a 50 kilometer by 300 kilometer (about
30 mile by 200 mile) area. The movement was the equivalent of a 6.7
magnitude earthquake.[11]
The motion did not trigger an earthquake and was only detectable as
silent, non-earthquake seismic signatures.[12]
In
2004, a study conducted by the Geological Society of America analyzed
the potential for land subsidence along the Cascadia subduction zone.
It postulated that several towns and cities on the west coast of
Vancouver Island, such as Tofino
and Ucluelet,
are at risk for a sudden, earthquake initiated, 1–2 m
subsidence.[13]
Studies
of past earthquake traces on both the northern San
Andreas Fault
and the southern Cascadia subduction zone indicate a correlation in
time which may be evidence that quakes on the Cascadia subduction
zone may have triggered most of the major quakes on the northern San
Andreas during at least the past 3,000 years or so. The evidence also
shows the rupture direction going from north to south in each of
these time-correlated events. The 1906
San Francisco earthquake
seems to have been a major exception to this correlation, however, as
it was not preceded by a major Cascadia quake.[14]
Great earthquakes
estimated year
|
interval
|
|
---|---|---|
2005 source[15]
|
2003 source[16]
|
(years)
|
about 9
pm, January 26, 1700 (NS)
|
780
|
|
780–1190
CE
|
880–960
CE
|
210
|
690–730
CE
|
550–750
CE
|
330
|
350–420
CE
|
250–320
CE
|
910
|
660-440
BCE
|
610–450
BCE
|
400
|
980–890
BCE
|
910–780
BCE
|
250
|
1440–1340
BCE
|
1150–1220
BCE
|
unknown
|
There
is also evidence of accompanying tsunamis
with every earthquake. One strong line of evidence for these
earthquakes is convergent timings for fossil damage from tsunamis in
the Pacific
Northwest
and historical Japanese records of tsunamis.[18]
The
next rupture of the Cascadia Subduction Zone is anticipated to be
capable of causing widespread destruction throughout the Pacific
Northwest.[19]
Prior
to the 1980s, scientists thought that the subduction zone did not
generate earthquakes like other subduction zones around the world,
but research by Brian
Atwater
and Kenji
Satake
tied together evidence of a large tsunami on the Washington coast
with documentation of an orphan tsunami in Japan (a tsunami without
an associated earthquake). The two pieces of the puzzle were linked,
and they then realized that the subduction zone was more hazardous
than previously suggested.
In
2009, some geologists predicted a 10% to 14% probability that the
Cascadia Subduction Zone will produce an event of magnitude 9.0 or
higher in the next 50 years.[20]
In 2010, studies suggested that the risk could be as high as 37% for
earthquakes of magnitude 8.0 or higher[21][22]
Geologists
and civil engineers have broadly determined that the Pacific
Northwest region is not well prepared for such a colossal earthquake.
The earthquake is expected to be similar to the 2011
Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami,
because the rupture is expected to be as long as the 2004
Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami.
The resulting tsunami
might reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).[20]
FEMA
estimates some 13,000 fatalities from such an event, with another
27,000 injured. It predicts that a million people will be displaced,
with yet another 2.5 million requiring food and water. An estimated
1/3 of public safety workers will not respond to the disaster due to
a collapse in infrastructure and a desire to ensure the safety of
themselves and their loved ones.[6]
Other analyses predict that even a magnitude 6.7 earthquake in
Seattle would result in 7,700 dead and injured, $33 billion in
damages, 39,000 buildings largely or totally destroyed, and 130
simultaneous fires.[4]
The
Cascade Volcanic Arc is a continental volcanic arc that extends from
northern California
to the coastal mountains of British
Columbia.[1]
The arc consists of a series of Quaternary age stratovolcanoes that
grew on top of pre-existing geologic materials that ranged from
Miocenevolcanics
to glacial
ice.[1]
The Cascade Volcanic arc is located approximately 100 km inland from
the coast, and forms a north-to-south chain of peaks that average
over 3,000 m (10,000 ft) in elevation.[1]
The major peaks from south to north include:
The
most active volcanoes in the chain include Mount St. Helens, Mt.
Baker, Lassen Peak, and Mt. Hood. St. Helens captured worldwide
attention when it erupted
catastrophically in 1980.[1]
St. Helens continues to rumble, albeit more quietly, emitting
occasional steam plumes and experiencing small earthquakes, both
signs of continuing magmatic activity.[1]
Most
of the volcanoes have a main, central vent from which the most recent
eruptions have occurred. The peaks are composed of layers of
solidified andesitic
to dacitic
magma,
and the more siliceous (and explosive) rhyolite.
The volcanoes above the subduction zone
include:
|
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f "Cascadia Subduction Zone Volcanism in British Columbia". Archived from the original on 2010-06-02. Retrieved 2008-12-18. USGS
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Stefan Lovgren (8 December 2003). "Did North American Quake Cause 1700 Japanese Tsunami?". National Geographic. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f "Ghosts of Tsunamis Past". American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kevin Krajick (March 2005). "Future Shocks: Modern science, ancient catastrophes and the endless quest to predict earthquakes". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h Jerry Thompson (13 March 2012). "The Giant, Underestimated Earthquake Threat to North America". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c d e Schulz, Kathryn (July 20, 2015). "The Really Big One: An earthquake will destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest. The question is when". The New Yorker. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Alt, David D.; Hyndman, Donald W. (1978). Roadside Geology of Oregon (19th ed.). Missoula, Montana: Mountain Press. p. 3. ISBN 0-87842-063-0.
- Jump up^ "Hyndman and Wang". Archived from the original on 2010-05-30. Retrieved 2009-12-17. USGS (dead link) See fig. 5 herefor the diagram.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Nedimović, Mladen R.; Hyndman, Roy D.; Ramachandran, Kumar; Spence, George D. (24 July 2003). "Reflection signature of seismic and aseismic slip on the northern Cascadia subduction interface". Nature. 424 (6947): 416–420. Bibcode:2003Natur.424..416N. doi:10.1038/nature01840. PMID 12879067.
- Jump up^ Dragert, Herb; Wang, Kelin; James, Thomas S. (25 May 2001). "A silent slip event on the deeper Cascadia subduction interface". Science. 292 (5521): 1525–1528. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1525D. doi:10.1126/science.1060152. PMID 11313500.
- Jump up^ Rogers, Garry; Dragert, Herb (20 June 2003). "Episodic tremor and slip on the Cascadia subduction zone: the chatter of silent slip". Science. 300 (5627): 1942–1943. Bibcode:2003Sci...300.1942R. doi:10.1126/science.1084783. PMID 12738870.
- Jump up^ Leonard, Lucinda J.; Hyndman, Roy D.; Mazzotti, Stéphane. "Coseismic subsidence in the 1700 great Cascadia earthquake: Coastal estimates versus elastic dislocation models". GSA Bulletin. 116 (5–6): 655–670. Bibcode:2004GSAB..116..655L. doi:10.1130/B25369.1.
- Jump up^ Brian F Atwater; Musumi-Rokkaku Satoko; Satake Kenji; Tsuji Yoshinobu; Ueda Kazue; David K Yamaguchi (2005). The Orphan Tsunami of 1700 — Japanese Clues to a Parent Earthquake in North America (PDF) (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1707 ed.). Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. p. 100 (timeline diagram). ISBN 0-295-98535-6.
- Jump up^ Brian F Atwater; Martitia P Tuttle; Eugene S Schweig; Charles M Rubin; David K Yamaguchi; Eileen Hemphill-Haley (2003). "Earthquake Recurrence Inferred from Paleoseismology" (PDF). Developments in Quaternary Science. Elsevier BV. 1. Figures 10 and 11 (pp 341, 342); article pp 331–350. doi:10.1016/S1571-0866(03)01015-7. ISSN 1571-0866. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-19. Retrieved 2011-03-15.
- Jump up^ "The Orphan Tsunami of 1700—Japanese Clues to a Parent Earthquake in North America" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-05-06.USGS Professional Paper 1707
- ^ Jump up to:a b Tobias, Lori (April 19, 2009). "Big earthquake coming sooner than we thought, Oregon geologist says". The Oregonian.
- Jump up^ Lovett, Richard A. (31 May 2010). "Risk of giant quake off American west coast goes up". Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2010.270. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
- Jump up^ "Odds are about 1-in-3 that mega-earthquake will hit Pacific Northwest in next 50 years, scientists say" (Press release). Oregon State University. May 25, 2010 – via Science Daily.
- Chris Goldfinger; C. Hans Nelson; Ann E. Morey; Joel E. Johnson; Jason R. Patton; Eugene Karabanov; Julia Gutiérrez-Pastor; Andrew T. Eriksson; Eulàlia Gràcia; Gita Dunhill; Randolph J. Enkin; Audrey Dallimore; Tracy Vallier (2012). Robert Kayen, ed. "Turbidite event history—Methods and implications for Holocene paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone". U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 1661–F.
- Atwater, BF (1987). "Evidence for great Holocene earthquakes along the outer coast of Washington State". Science. 236(4804): 942–44. Bibcode:1987Sci...236..942A. doi:10.1126/science.236.4804.942. PMID 17812748.
- "Cascadia Peril '09" at dailywireless.org
No comments:
Post a Comment